Achieving 4K UHD DATV- very draft
Achieving 4K UHD DATV- very draft
Perhaps a little early, but 4K DATV may be more achievable
than I first thought. It would be a bit of a technological coup if amateur
radio can do 4K before regular free-to-air broadcast TV. 4K video cameras and monitors are already
relatively inexpensive. 4K TV capture/switchers are available and not too
expensive. The missing link are modulators, transmitters and receivers, but may
be possible using inexpensive SDR TRX; they can already do DVB-T/S.
As far as I am aware, broadcast TV is still struggling with
Full HD digital TV in some countries, notably the USA with a very large number
of small TV stations and the not insignificant cost of having to replace
virtually everything, other than their antenna. I suspect the same across some
of Europe and Asia. For both terrestrial and satellite, while they may have
digital TV, most of it is SD (standard definition) or HD (high definition
720p), rather than wide-screen Full HD (1080i; wish it was 1080p).
While I raise the possibility of 4K DATV, the other technology for the future that I raise, networked, internet-linked DATV is probably a greater personal objective. However, others may be interested in low-cost 4K. I can see a real need for 4K in CCTV, where definition matters; it is not just technology bling.
4K DATV is a good use of the numerous UHF bands/spectrum that amateur radio has, but only makes limited use of. In many countries there is pressure to take amateur radio spectrum and use it for other purposes. Use it or loose it?
While I raise the possibility of 4K DATV, the other technology for the future that I raise, networked, internet-linked DATV is probably a greater personal objective. However, others may be interested in low-cost 4K. I can see a real need for 4K in CCTV, where definition matters; it is not just technology bling.
4K DATV is a good use of the numerous UHF bands/spectrum that amateur radio has, but only makes limited use of. In many countries there is pressure to take amateur radio spectrum and use it for other purposes. Use it or loose it?
I will start with the easy bits and progress toward the more
difficult aspects.
4K UHD TV Standards: 2160p
Fortunately there is a 4K UHDTV standard, 2160p, (3840
x2160) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-high-definition_television,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2160p. It is similar but not the same as the video
standard used in cinemas with digital projectors.
It is interesting that it is progressive, 2160p, not
interlaced, 2160i. While those who developed digital TV standards a couple of
decades ago, 1080i would have been virtually unachievable, but like so many
computer standards, it has been surpassed. Further, I suspect that the step
will be straight to 2160p TV, with 1080p languishing. 1080p is needed for
recording, but not likely to be used live. It is difficult to buy a 1080p to
1080i converter, well, relatively expensive at $600+ per camera; my current
dilemma.4K UHD Displays/TVs
4K PC 28” displays are common and fairly cheap, about $600.
I have a Samsung one, but don’t use it as a PC monitor. They use older-style TN
LED screens that are good straight on, but are poor for angle viewing. Sitting
500mm from the PC monitor, the sides are blurry. Tried it for a month, great for reading PDF
magazines, but tiring otherwise. I went back to my 28” 2K IPS LED monitor.
Still much better than Full HD 1080p!
I use a Panasonic plasma for the little bit of TV I watch, and have a Full HD projector, that gets even less use. Both get around the side-view problem of LCD.
Apple has announced a 5K monitor since I started writing this post. 4K IPS LCD panels are available, but still a bit expensive.
I use a Panasonic plasma for the little bit of TV I watch, and have a Full HD projector, that gets even less use. Both get around the side-view problem of LCD.
Apple has announced a 5K monitor since I started writing this post. 4K IPS LCD panels are available, but still a bit expensive.
4K UHD cameras
There are a range of 4K UHD cameras on the
market, starting with the Hero action cameras, about $450, a number of consumer
4K DSLR, the cheapest currently
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4, about $1500 body only, BlackMagic Studio Camera
4K, about $3000 body only. The costs are likely to drop quickly, as it did for
the 1080p cameras.
One caveat with 4K UHD cameras is that while they can record
at 4K, I am not sure what they stream live. It may be 2160p, but it wouldn’t
surprise me if it is still 1080p, with the exception of the BM Studio Camera
4K, it has no record function and will stream live 4K. The GH4 streams 4K too. To be investigated
further. All the same, the cheaper
cameras can record at 4K. An amateur 4K system is likely to start with recorded
media then move to live.
4K Production switcher
Perhaps not essential, but likely kit even for a Full HD
DATV station, the BM ATEM Production Studio 4K, about $1700, allows the use of
multiple HDMI and SDI cameras and other devices (recorded media, PC)
https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/atem/techspecs/W-APS-04.
HDMI devices negotiate connection standards that can be
problematic when connecting devices in ways other than what the manufacturer
intended. The switchers handle those problems well.
HDMI is not the preferred interface for 4K, the switcher can
output UHD SDI, potentially making the interface with the modulator much
simpler.4K Compression standards
There is a 4K compression standard: H-265: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Video_Coding. Not a simple subject, but amazing technology.
Compression is a key to usable 4K, to reduce the storage space and data rate but keep the quality; a contradiction. There has been considerable progress in compression, the move from MPEG-2 to H-264 for Full HD being a recent example.
Compression is a key to usable 4K, to reduce the storage space and data rate but keep the quality; a contradiction. There has been considerable progress in compression, the move from MPEG-2 to H-264 for Full HD being a recent example.
4K Transmitter/amplifier
Compressed 4K UHD will fit in a standard 6, 7 or 8 MHz ATV channel. I think DATV in some countries are restricted to 2 MHz, but that may only be for lower UHF bands such as 70cm. The bandwidth and modulation parameters determine the necessary data rate, which clearly will be higher than for Full HD. In Australia we can use 7 Mhz on 70cm up, at the same standards as free-to-air broadcast TV.
DVB-T at 7 MHz bandwidth has the capacity to handle 4K UHD, but always needs a
very linear amplifier. I am not sure what data rates are possible with DVB-S.
As such any good DVB-T transmitter/amplifier should be able to handle
4k; to a point the content is not relevant, although modulation parameters can
make greater demands on the TX linearity.4K modulator/encoder
Ok, now we are into the curly stuff. Current 4K modulators
are expensive broadcast devices ($10000+).
However, Nuand BladeRF SDR TRX, a FPGA-based device, may be able
to be programed for 4K UHD, linked by USB3 with a PC, networked to the BM ATEM
TV Studio for digital and audio inputs. As noted in my last post, the BladeRF has been used for DATV DVB-T: http://yo3iiu.ro/blog/?p=1191, http://www.irrational.net/2014/03/02/digital-atv/. They may be interested in the challenge of 4K UHD DATV with GNU radio. Developing the modulation/encoding It is beyond me.4K UHD CCTV with dedicated chips per HiDes/ITE DVB-T devices??
optical-astronomy: reducing interference: noise cancelling
…. To be continued ….
I Like to add one more important thing here, 4K Ultra-high Definition (UHD) Technologies Market Size, By Product (Television sets, Projectors, Personal Computers, Smart-Phones), By Application (Home use, Industrial, Digital signage), By Technology (LCD, LED, OLED), By Region (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Rest of the World) Analysis - Global Forecast 2021-2026.
ReplyDelete