Why the phase noise of a U-Blox GPS module at 10 MHz is terrible
Why the phase noise of a U-Blox GPS module at 10 MHz is terrible.
There was a YouTube video showing the poor phase noise of a U-Blox GNSS module programmable pulse output at 10 MHz but cleaner at 8 MHz. It suggested that it was because the module does an integer division of its disciplined clock at 24 MHz. So the 8 MHz is clean and the 10 MHz is not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6SmdqMA-Dg&t=1611s "Using a GPS module as variable frequency reference standard"
In a U-Blox application note, I found that the presenter is correct in that it uses an integer division, but the clock is 48 MHz. The non-integer pulses seem to be made up of two pulses with a delay between them to give the correct frequency pulse but with many artifacts and consequent phase noise, as shown in the image from the paper.
https://content.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/products/documents/Timing_AppNote_%28GPS.G6-X-11007%29.pdf "GPS-based Timing Considerations with u-blox 6 GPS receivers"
Hi Andrew, hope the next links can be useful
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ra3apw.ru/proekty/ublox-neo-7m/
http://www.ra3apw.ru/ublox-neo-7m-ocxo-gpsdo/
Google translator can help ... :-)
Hi. Thanks for the references. This was a draft post that was incomplete. Others have noted the same thing. My main purpose was to give u-blox's explanation as to why there are good and bad frequencies.
Delete